Quote
"

For most of America, Psy is a funny name, a funny face, and a funny personality. He doesn’t sing in English and most people just don’t get it leaving most of them to not take him seriously. It’s easy to strip the significance behind “Gangnam Style” down if you don’t know what it means and solely find entertainment in the Asian guy shaking his hips. But what most people don’t realize is that Psy doesn’t take himself seriously. He’s a satirist and political dissident. “Gangnam Style” was a commentary, not just a fun pop tune with a silly dance.

Gangnam is Seoul’s wealthiest and flashiest neighborhood. For South Koreans, Gangnam represents the ideal life of excess and consumerism. Psy’s character in the video is a wannabe Gangnamite. He dreams he’s living the flashy, excessive lifestyle while he’s really just like everyone else, swimming in a public pool and riding the subway. But never in the video does it seem that Psy’s character is unhappy. He’s content to play in a children’s playground and meet the girl of his dreams in the subway. “Gangnam Style” is much more that we have made it, but that’s not surprising considering Psy’s background and how little we know about it.

In America, it seems like “Gangnam Style” was Psy’s big break when in fact the song had been released on his sixth studio album and his music career hadn’t been about making flashy and catchy songs. He believes music is the key to overcoming the intolerance embedded in his country’s political systems. Throughout his career, his songs have been banned for inappropriate content and have been surrounded by controversy, not to mention the fact that he fought his mandatory military draft.

Psy is a voice for his people. He’s fighting the oppression and intolerance he sees in his culture through his music. And by ignoring his worth and his value, we’re reducing the culture of South Korea into a short man with funny pants doing a ridiculous dance.

"

Opinion: American media chooses to undervalue artists like Psy from “Gangnam Style”  (via kpop-confessions)

(Source: pag-asaharibon, via thatonewannabechef)

Photo
pipwasreal:

themexicansnob:

mybluedecember:

princess-munchkin:

barbeauxbot:

deducecanoe:

ruthpower:

Bill Nye is my favorite
Dawkins needs to get over himself

Bam. Dawkins is a jerk.

How can anybody be that hostile to Bill Nye. Look at him. It’s like Bill Nye’s innate goodness and love for humanity and science is repelling him.

How the fuck does Bill Nye expect this to happen? What do you want to do, force women to enroll in science courses, regardless of whether or not they want to do it? Just for the sake of having “enough” women? Why the fuck do these fractions matter so much? It’s not like people are holding guns to our head and threatening to kill us if we become interested in science.Maybe, just maybe, a lot of us DON’T FUCKING WANT to be scientists. Is that a crime?

Hi there, princess-munchkin. Female engineering student here. 
Bill Nye is not saying that you HAVE to be a scientist, and you are right that no one is holding a gun to my head because I am interested in science, but let me tell you some of the struggles of being a woman in the STEM fields. 
1) Because I am a woman, I am not expected to excel in these fields. I first fully realized this when I was in high school, on my robotics team. See, although my robotics team was about 50% female, most of the women were part of the “business administration” side of things: finance, marketting, PR, membership, etc. Was this a problem? Absolutely not. But I was there to be an engineer, and specifically, to be the robot programmer. This was met with a lot of hesitation at first from some of the other students (all of whom happened to be male. This is not necessarily a bad thing.) You see, all of the robot programmers before me were guys. Computer programming is just a thing that guys do, or so they thought. Even after I had proved myself to the mentors on the team, many of the students still underestimated my abilities. There were rumors going around that I wouldn’t have been able to program the robot at all if the lead software mentor wasn’t there to help me. This was just flat-out false, but it wasn’t until I won an award for the team that the other students actually saw my merit. 
2) There is not a lot of encouragement for women to go into these fields. I first noticed this when I was in elementary school. I was always interested in math, science, you name it, but many of my teachers and family members pushed that to the side for a long time. When I asked for legos for christmas, I would get ballet slippers. In fact, for a long time, I was training to be a professional dancer. I loved to dance. I loved math more, but no one seemed to notice that about me. It wasn’t until I had a long conversation with one particular teacher in high school that I decided to look into engineering. I had never even considered it as an option before, because no one decided to encourage me to pursue my interest in science. If it hadn’t been for that teacher, I would probably not be at the school I am at right now. 
3) For a long time, Engineering/Science/Math WAS a “boys only” club. Let me tell you when some of the top technical schools and societies started letting women in:
RPI, The oldest tech school in the country, founded in 1824. Started admitting women in 1942 to “replace men called to war.” Campus housing for women wasn’t constructed until 1966. 
Tau Beta Pi, the Engineering Honors Society - Founded in 1885. Started admitting women in 1968.
Caltech - Currently rated #3 in undergraduate engineering. Founded in 1891. Started admitting women in 1970. 
Georgia Tech - Currently rated #5 in undergraduate engineering. Founded in 1885. Started admitting women in 1952. 
Do you see the implications of this? Engineering has been a part of our society since around the late 1800s (in the case of RPI, since the 1820s), but women weren’t even allowed in for the most part until the 1950s, regardless of their merit. 
4) Because of the fact that it was a “boys only” club for such a long time, there are not a lot of women engineers and scientists to look up to. When you’re reading your physics, chemistry, and math text books, the majority of those theories were came up with by men. It is true that much of our history was written by White Men, but this does not mean that the fact that there are few women scientists to look up does not matter. 
So, as you can hopefully see, princess-munckin, or anyone else that shares the opinions of princess-munchkin, Bill Nye was not arguing that women that are not interested in STEM should go into those fields anyway. But he IS arguing against all of the systematic barriers set up against women who ARE interested in engineering and science. There are several women out there who are just as good as the boys at math and science, but will never pursue their interests because it just doesn’t seem like an option. That was me for a long time. I am super grateful for the fact that I fought against that, and that I ended up where I am. 
if you don’t like science, fine. Don’t be a scientist. But if one day you have a daughter and she shows interest in being a scientist, PLEASE encourage her. Because Bill Nye is right, there needs to be more women scientists in the world. 

Also reblog because all engineers are awesome no matter the gender

Yesss my cousin is a software engineer at Google and she runs information courses with school students who might like computer science, because most of them don’t even know what it is or  whether they’d be interested in studying it, and they might be brilliant if they’re given a chance.
Caitlin Moran also has opinions about fractions… in either ‘How to be a Woman’ (the title’s tongue-in-cheek, don’t be a hater, just read it) or her ‘Moranthology’, sorry I can’t remember which. Her reasoning is that if there ARE simply MORE women in traditionally male-dominated workplaces, it will allow the women who love it and are talented in it to feel comfortable and succeed, with less pressure to be THE BEST SCIENTIST EVER or the BEST TRUCK DRIVER or whatever just because they’re female. Bearing in mind that secretary, teacher and librarian were all male-dominated workforces too, not so long ago. If they love it, if they want to do it, they should be able to without feeling belittled or ashamed.


Tumblr: the only place where hating on Dawkins becomes bitching over social constructs because someone completely misunderstands something that Bill Nye said.

pipwasreal:

themexicansnob:

mybluedecember:

princess-munchkin:

barbeauxbot:

deducecanoe:

ruthpower:

Bill Nye is my favorite

Dawkins needs to get over himself

Bam. Dawkins is a jerk.

How can anybody be that hostile to Bill Nye. Look at him. It’s like Bill Nye’s innate goodness and love for humanity and science is repelling him.

How the fuck does Bill Nye expect this to happen? What do you want to do, force women to enroll in science courses, regardless of whether or not they want to do it? Just for the sake of having “enough” women? Why the fuck do these fractions matter so much? It’s not like people are holding guns to our head and threatening to kill us if we become interested in science.
Maybe, just maybe, a lot of us DON’T FUCKING WANT to be scientists. Is that a crime?

Hi there, princess-munchkin. Female engineering student here. 

Bill Nye is not saying that you HAVE to be a scientist, and you are right that no one is holding a gun to my head because I am interested in science, but let me tell you some of the struggles of being a woman in the STEM fields. 

1) Because I am a woman, I am not expected to excel in these fields. I first fully realized this when I was in high school, on my robotics team. See, although my robotics team was about 50% female, most of the women were part of the “business administration” side of things: finance, marketting, PR, membership, etc. Was this a problem? Absolutely not. But I was there to be an engineer, and specifically, to be the robot programmer. This was met with a lot of hesitation at first from some of the other students (all of whom happened to be male. This is not necessarily a bad thing.) You see, all of the robot programmers before me were guys. Computer programming is just a thing that guys do, or so they thought. Even after I had proved myself to the mentors on the team, many of the students still underestimated my abilities. There were rumors going around that I wouldn’t have been able to program the robot at all if the lead software mentor wasn’t there to help me. This was just flat-out false, but it wasn’t until I won an award for the team that the other students actually saw my merit. 

2) There is not a lot of encouragement for women to go into these fields. I first noticed this when I was in elementary school. I was always interested in math, science, you name it, but many of my teachers and family members pushed that to the side for a long time. When I asked for legos for christmas, I would get ballet slippers. In fact, for a long time, I was training to be a professional dancer. I loved to dance. I loved math more, but no one seemed to notice that about me. It wasn’t until I had a long conversation with one particular teacher in high school that I decided to look into engineering. I had never even considered it as an option before, because no one decided to encourage me to pursue my interest in science. If it hadn’t been for that teacher, I would probably not be at the school I am at right now. 

3) For a long time, Engineering/Science/Math WAS a “boys only” club. Let me tell you when some of the top technical schools and societies started letting women in:

  • RPI, The oldest tech school in the country, founded in 1824. Started admitting women in 1942 to “replace men called to war.” Campus housing for women wasn’t constructed until 1966. 
  • Tau Beta Pi, the Engineering Honors Society - Founded in 1885. Started admitting women in 1968.
  • Caltech - Currently rated #3 in undergraduate engineering. Founded in 1891. Started admitting women in 1970. 
  • Georgia Tech - Currently rated #5 in undergraduate engineering. Founded in 1885. Started admitting women in 1952. 

Do you see the implications of this? Engineering has been a part of our society since around the late 1800s (in the case of RPI, since the 1820s), but women weren’t even allowed in for the most part until the 1950s, regardless of their merit. 

4) Because of the fact that it was a “boys only” club for such a long time, there are not a lot of women engineers and scientists to look up to. When you’re reading your physics, chemistry, and math text books, the majority of those theories were came up with by men. It is true that much of our history was written by White Men, but this does not mean that the fact that there are few women scientists to look up does not matter. 

So, as you can hopefully see, princess-munckin, or anyone else that shares the opinions of princess-munchkin, Bill Nye was not arguing that women that are not interested in STEM should go into those fields anyway. But he IS arguing against all of the systematic barriers set up against women who ARE interested in engineering and science. There are several women out there who are just as good as the boys at math and science, but will never pursue their interests because it just doesn’t seem like an option. That was me for a long time. I am super grateful for the fact that I fought against that, and that I ended up where I am. 

if you don’t like science, fine. Don’t be a scientist. But if one day you have a daughter and she shows interest in being a scientist, PLEASE encourage her. Because Bill Nye is right, there needs to be more women scientists in the world. 

Also reblog because all engineers are awesome no matter the gender

Yesss my cousin is a software engineer at Google and she runs information courses with school students who might like computer science, because most of them don’t even know what it is or  whether they’d be interested in studying it, and they might be brilliant if they’re given a chance.

Caitlin Moran also has opinions about fractions… in either ‘How to be a Woman’ (the title’s tongue-in-cheek, don’t be a hater, just read it) or her ‘Moranthology’, sorry I can’t remember which. Her reasoning is that if there ARE simply MORE women in traditionally male-dominated workplaces, it will allow the women who love it and are talented in it to feel comfortable and succeed, with less pressure to be THE BEST SCIENTIST EVER or the BEST TRUCK DRIVER or whatever just because they’re female. Bearing in mind that secretary, teacher and librarian were all male-dominated workforces too, not so long ago. If they love it, if they want to do it, they should be able to without feeling belittled or ashamed.

Tumblr: the only place where hating on Dawkins becomes bitching over social constructs because someone completely misunderstands something that Bill Nye said.

(Source: scienceing, via thatonewannabechef)

Video

Odd Man Out #8. Not much to say.

Photo
happy-sasquatch-flying-a-tardis:

fondlyregardcreation:

fairly odd parents fucking knows what’s up
never heard truer words in my life

Oh look there’s math to prove it too


I = NamesI = PsychologistsI = $

happy-sasquatch-flying-a-tardis:

fondlyregardcreation:

fairly odd parents fucking knows what’s up

never heard truer words in my life

Oh look there’s math to prove it too

I = Names
I = Psychologists
I = $

(Source: dareyounottolaugh, via thatonewannabechef)

Photoset

diarrheaworldstarhiphop:

a-short-history-of-nothing:

thelizardgamer:

The latest rumors surrounding the Xbox One are that the demos that Microsoft allowed people to play on at E3 were not running on an Xbox One, but instead running on high-end PCs with Titan graphics cards.


If this is the case, they were running the games on a system that is around 3x faster than the Xbox One.

These rumors are backed up by images that clearly show a high-end desktop under the displays of the Xbox One stands at E3.

Its like a train wreck that you can’t look away from

YO HOLLA @ THE PC GAYMIN MASTER RACE

They were livestreaming footage right? Or at least recording it for trailers? Who’s to say that the high-powered megacomputers weren’t for recording or streaming? Speaking from experience, professional streams need decent processing power and recording with MSI or Fraps eats HDD space for breakfast. I’m not excited about the Xbone, but let’s consider other options here…

(via thatonewannabechef)

Text

lesbianfang:

if someone is genuinely interested in buying the xbox one, cool!

if someone is genuinely interested in buying the ps4, cool!

if someone is genuinely interested in buying the wii u, cool!

please stop making people feel like shit just because they’re interested in a console that you don’t support

(via brohannahrooth)

Photo
“you dumb asshole”

“you dumb asshole”

(via thatonewannabechef)

Tags: lol
Photo
Video

pc-gamer-girl:

shota-san:

IM LAHUGJING SO HARD OMGG

THE DIFFERENCE IN REACTIONS BETWEEN PRICES OF PS4 AND XBOX ONE EVERYBODY

oh god it’s almost cruel to laugh

(via pcro)

Photo
bigfootaus:

uhvatar:

padnote:

hitoshura0:

The true power of next generation gaming

GET HYPE FOR SICK HIGH FIVES WITH YOUR POKEBROS



fans of Wooper will obviously be up in arms about this unfair high-fiving feature

bigfootaus:

uhvatar:

padnote:

hitoshura0:

The true power of next generation gaming

GET HYPE FOR SICK HIGH FIVES WITH YOUR POKEBROS

image

fans of Wooper will obviously be up in arms about this unfair high-fiving feature